Thursday, March 5, 2009

i dont really know if my point was made clearly enough in tuesdays class. i do feel that Olivers actions were a form of racism, one of many forms. what i meant by it was that in their culture, relitive to them, they were doing what was best for what they thought. there is no question that we can look back at the atrocities commited by not only Edmontonians, but most Albertans in that time range, and feel a sense of disgust. Moving the 'Indians' away from land that was profitable to the 'whites' was their way of becoming more powerful. with the opening of residential school across Canada, they destroyed many diverse cultures by forcing religion upon them, not to mention the blatant sexual abuse that took place. i am by no means defending Frank Olivers actions but in their day it was normal. ethically, relativism is a poor starting ground in the fact that anything can be justified due to the thoughts and beliefs of those occupying that time frame. there was nothing right about what they did and it seems to me that more people should know this story.

1 comment:

  1. I agree. I think that discussion got a little confusing on tuesday and it seems to me like we were (well most of us) were arguing for the same ideas. I agree that for that time the bahaviour was thought to be acceptable and that if the same thing was done today, people would hardly think it was right. The actions were THOUGHT to be what was right but as things have changed, looking back and seing what "the whites" did to the "Indians" we can see just how racist people were in a land that wasnt just theirs.
    I must say though, it was probably one of the more engaging conversations/debates we have had in this class which also tells me that alot of our classmates werent entirely okay with what we had read.

    ReplyDelete